A - acceptance critera to Agilometer | B - backlog to business case | C - change authority to customer subject matter expert | D - definition of 'done' to Dynamic Systems Development Method | E - early adopter to experiment | F - G - feature to Glad! Sad! Mad! | H - I - higlight report to issue | K - Kaizen to Kano | L - lead time to Little's Law | M - manage by exception to MoSCoW | P - Plan-Do-Check-Act to push system | Q - quality assurance to quality tolerance | R - RACI to risk register | S - SAFe to supplier subject matter expert | T - team dynamics to transparency | U - V - user story to visioning | W - Waterfall method to workshop
acceptance criteria
A prioritized list of criteria that the project product must meet before the customer will accept it, i.e. measurable definitions of the attributes required for the set of products to be acceptable to key stakeholders (PRINCE2 definition). The acceptance criteria are commonly used in agile for assessing whether a user story has been met.
agile behaviour(s)
Those behaviours that are seen as typifying working in an agile way e.g. being collaborative, self-organizing, customer- focused, empowered, trusting not blaming.
agile plans
Agile plans may show features (or sets of features) and their order and their dependencies, and are likely to have been created collaboratively by those who will carry out the planned work. Agile plans tend to be informal or low-tech at the delivery team level and this can be highly effective even though they may be no more than to-do lists or backlogs. Product- based planning can still be used at all levels of the project (including product delivery).
Agilometer
Copyright © AXELOS Limited 2012. All rights reserved. Material is reproduced with the permission of AXELOS.